# 'Verifying shoes', 'Echt of Nep', 'Zapatillas Originales': how a verification app with only 2 ratings reached the charts in 21 stores

> Source: https://stringers.io/en/apps/ios_6798683886.html (Stringers / 什么值得做, generated 2026-11-08)
> Stringers answers one question every day: what small product can one or two people build in a few months and actually make money from. Numbers come from 15 databases we collect daily, each with source and date.
> For agents: these verdicts and the underlying databases (verified revenue, App Store / Google Play charts, ad libraries, GitHub, Product Hunt…) are queryable live over MCP — tools today / hot / products / directions / direction / data. Setup: https://github.com/komako-workshop/stringers (the user logs in at stringers.io → "配置 agent" to get a personal URL). Site index: https://stringers.io/llms.txt

> It hasn't really taken off: every store uses the local search term as its title (驗鞋, Echt of Nep, Zapatillas Originales), plus a hard weekly subscription paywall. On small-country grossing charts with an extremely low bar, a few subscriptions put it on the chart. Ratings in the last 10 days: 0 new.

[Mobile App](https://stringers.io/en/apps/index.md) · iOS · written 11-6

Verify

驗鞋: Legit Check (Realis; US store name Legit Check Shoes) · Atomik Teknoloji Bilgisayar Yazilim Limited Sirketi

# 「驗鞋」「Echt of Nep」「Zapatillas Originales」: how a verification app with just 2 ratings charted in 21 stores

**What it is** An AI app that tells whether sneakers and designer bags are real in about 30 seconds from a few photos. It outputs a shareable authentication report. Weekly $7.99, yearly $29.99.

**Why it's trending** It isn't really trending. In each store the listing title is the local-language search term itself (驗鞋, Echt of Nep, Zapatillas Originales), and a hard weekly paywall means a handful of subscriptions is enough to chart in tiny-country Top Grossing lists. Ratings added in 10 days: 0.

**C** **How you could follow it** Don't copy a pure-AI verification subscription. The category already has a dozen clones. What's worth learning is the ASO move of using local search terms as titles in each store. If you do go into verification, build an AI-screened, human-signed pay-per-check version, and pick one category and one market.

C grade: it's a late entrant in a pile of identical AI clones. The leader CheckCheck charts in 78 stores, and users already doubt pure-AI accuracy, so following it doesn't pay. What you can take is zero-cost localized title ASO, and the lesson not to mistake small-country charts for volume. Few people know about it yet

Data (updated daily) · First launched 2026-08-20 · Vietnam rating 1 · Charted in 11-08 of 19 stores

iOS · best category chart rank · by store

Korea Italy Croatia

Data 2026-10-28 → 2026-11-08 (12 days, 12 observations). Lower rank is higher; gaps mean it wasn't charted that day

iOS · Rating count · Vietnam

Data 2026-10-28 → 2026-11-08 (12 days, 12 observations). Apple doesn't publish download counts; rating growth is a proxy for downloads.

Realis is an AI photo-authentication app from a small Turkish studio, at $7.99 a week. Two and a half months after launch it appears on Reference Top Grossing charts in 21 stores, which looks like quiet money in small-language markets. In reality it has only 2 ratings worldwide, and its rank is held up by a few subscriptions. This piece covers why it looks hot, how crowded the category really is, and the one move worth copying.

### An update titled "Traditional Chinese is here"

In Sep 2026 12, Atomik Teknoloji, a small Turkish company, shipped version 1.1 of Realis. The first line of the release notes reads "Traditional Chinese is here, with the whole app and every report fully localized", the second "Faster verdicts and far fewer failed checks, thanks to a rebuilt AI pipeline" (App Store US, 11-06).

After that update, its Taiwan store name became "驗鞋: Legit Check". It's not a translated brand name. It uses the two characters Taiwanese buyers actually type.

It does the same in other stores. One app is "Zapatillas Originales: Realis" (genuine sneakers) in El Salvador, Mexico, Chile and Peru, "Originale o Falso" (original or fake) in Italy, "Echt of Nep" in the Netherlands, "Äkta eller Falsk" in Sweden, "가품 정품" in Korea, and "Legit Check Shoes" in the US. It covers 30 languages in total.

### What it is

Open the app, pick a category (sneakers, bags and wallets, watches, sunglasses, clothing, beauty and fragrance), follow the prompts to take up to 8 angles, and get a result in about 30 seconds: genuine, fake, or "can't determine". The traditional Chinese store description says:

> Most verification tools just guess. Realis doesn't. When photo information is insufficient, it says so honestly and specifies which angle to reshoot next.

It checks the font and letter spacing on the size tag, whether US/UK/EUR/CM sizes match, whether the SKU and box label agree, stitch density, and the toe box and outsole shape. Each item comes with an explanation, and the output is an authentication report you can send to a buyer or seller. Free to download; you only see a preview without a subscription. Weekly $7.99, yearly $29.99 (US store page, 11-06).

The same developer account shipped 2026 apps from 7 to October 6: sneaker verification, resale price estimates, food ingredient scanning, UK driving test routes, Swiss driving licence theory, and Irish taxi licence exams. All are "a narrow need + AI or a question bank + subscription". The website atomikteknoloji.com is one line and an email address. Realis is the best performer of these 6.

### How big it really is

| Date | Total ratings, all stores | New today | Stores charted |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10-28 | 3 | – | 15 |
| 11-01 | 3 | 0 | 17 |
| 11-04 | 3 | 0 | 19 |
| 11-06 | 2 | 0 | 21 |

(App Store ratings count, all stores combined; charting includes Top Grossing and Top Free)

The number of stores it charts in keeps rising, but the ratings count hasn't moved. Its best rank is #8 on the Slovenia Reference Top Grossing chart (10-28). It's #24 in El Salvador, #23 in Croatia, and #25 in Estonia. It's not on any chart in the US.

The rank trajectory tells the story. El Salvador: 24, 28, 32, 41, 46, 140, 148, 173, then one day back to 25, then down to 29. Slovenia: 8, 12, 21, 32, 39, 46, 107... sliding all the way to 134. The shape is "someone paid for a weekly plan one day, the rank jumped, then it slid every day after," with no sustained volume in between.

How low is the bar for Reference Top Grossing in these small stores? Look at positions 20–35 on the El Salvador chart: DeepL, several AI translators, a Bible app, and an app that sells Instagram followers (App Store chart, 11-06). A few $7.99 payments are enough to get in.

The description says "join 30,000+ users" and the update notes say "Join the thousands who check before they pay". Both fail to match 2 global ratings. Treat them as marketing copy (unverified).

### Where users come from

- **Store search + local search terms as titles in each store.** Confirmed. It's the only channel you can see. Words like "Echt of Nep" and "Originale o Falso" have far less competition than English "legit check", so a little organic search converts a few sales.

- **Hard paywall + weekly plan.** Confirmed. Download volume is tiny, but each sale is $7.99, which is enough to chart in small stores.

- **"Customers also bought" in the store.** Possible. The recommendation slots on the Egypt store page are full of similar verification apps that cross-link each other. Unverified.

- **Ads, TikTok, X, Reddit, press.** None found. Meta's ad library returns nothing, no TikTok video covers it, nobody mentioned it on X in the last 30 days, and the only web traces are the store pages and listing sites.

### How crowded the category is

There are two ways to do verification: the established "AI pre-screen + human experts, paid per check", and the "pure AI, weekly subscription" that emerged over the last 2025–2026 years. Realis is the second kind.

| Product | Launched | Scale (App Store, 11-06) | Approach |
|---|---|---|---|
| CheckCheck | 2019-11 | Up to 7,253 ratings in a single store. It charts in 78 stores' category Top Grossing lists: #1 in Panama, #4 in Taiwan, #5 in Mexico, #13 in the US. | AI pre-screen + two human reviewers, about $6 per check, creator promo codes |
| LegitApp | 2020-10 | Claims 2.5M users, 361 reviews on Trustpilot | Human + AI, tiered at $3 / $4 / $5 by speed |
| Legit Check: AI Scanner | 2025-06 | Charts in 64 stores, #3 in Jordan, #4 in Vietnam; 367 ratings combined | Pure-AI subscription, a year earlier, covers 4 times as many countries as Realis |
| Sneaker AI: Shoe Authenticator | 2024-07 | Charts in 39 stores | Pure AI, sneakers only |
| Legit Check: Real or Fake AI | 2026-04 | 23 stores, #8 in Vietnam, #12 in Hong Kong | Pure AI, also a Turkish developer |
| Legitly | 2026-07 | 18 stores, #6 in Thailand, #6 in Lithuania | Pure AI, also localizes titles by store |
| Verró: Tasche echt oder fake? | 2026-08-29 | 12 stores, #9 in Jordan | Launched within days of Realis, focused on bags |
| POIZON (international edition of Dewu) | 2020 | Big platform, TikTok creator videos with 3–600k views | Free verification, used to drive trades |
| StockX / GOAT / eBay | — | Big platform | You verify yourself after receiving the item; third-party reports don't count on the platform |

Pure-AI verification apps with "legit check" or "real or fake" in the name: at least 2025 since June 15, most launched in 2026, many by individual Turkish developers. Ranked by stores charted, Realis sits around #6 in the pure-AI pack. It's not the first, and it's not the biggest.

Users aren't buying the pure-AI approach either. Fashion-tech site fashionaidaily's Aug 27 review quoted a r/Repsneakers thread: someone ran the same pair through four apps, three said real and one said fake. Another wrote, "Goat and CheckCheck say legit but Suede One says fake." Legit Check App By Ch's founder, whose app is fully human, put it more bluntly on Reddit: "Human authentications are the way to go for the moment — no AI, but human." Realis's copy about saying "can't determine" and telling you which angle to reshoot is aimed squarely at this pain point, but no review or test shows it delivers. Legitly and AI Scanner use similar copy.

### The one move worth copying

It's not the verification. It's the title.

Most developers localize by translating the English name, or just keep the English brand name. Atomik's approach: in each store, the front half of the title is the word locals would actually search, and the brand name Realis goes after the colon. It's 驗鞋 in Taiwan, 가품 정품 in Korea, Echt of Nep in the Netherlands. The cost is nearly zero, and an afternoon is enough to do 30 stores.

Paired with a hard weekly paywall, this approach gets an app with zero promotion onto the Top Grossing charts in a dozen small stores. But charting isn't earning: 2 ratings and 10 new ones in 0 days suggest real paying users may be in the single digits to dozens (inferred).

### If it were you

**Bottom line:** Realis hasn't really broken out. It's one more entrant in a category already crowded with a dozen pure-AI clones. Build the same thing and you'll most likely end up with 2 ratings too. What's worth taking is the ASO tactic of using local search terms as titles in each store, plus a warning: charting on a small country's Reference or Utilities Top Grossing list doesn't mean there's volume.

**Who it fits:** Small studios that already have a subscription-tool template and can ship one narrow app a month, treating localized titles as a standard step in every launch. Or teams with real human authentication skills (who know shoes, bags, and watches) that can run "AI pre-screen + human review" and want to build a local CheckCheck for one language market.

**Who it doesn't fit:** Solo developers who want to build a pure-AI subscription app that's "a bit more accurate" at sneaker checks. Users can't tell which one is more accurate. The leader CheckCheck already charts in 78 stores and ranks #4 in Taiwan, and identical clones keep piling up every month. One wrong verdict is a one-star review, and it can drag you into resale disputes.

**How to do it:**

- If you only want to learn ASO: on every app launch, swap the title in 30 stores for local search terms, and don't translate the brand name. Two weeks after launch, see which stores' organic search converts, then make screenshots and descriptions for those stores.

- If you really want to enter verification: don't do a pure-AI subscription. Do a pay-per-check version with AI pre-screening and a human signing off, and pick one category and one market, such as only resale luxury bags or only Japanese and Korean. Human judgment is what pure-AI clones can't offer, and it's the reason users will pay $5–10 per check.

**How to get users:** Localized titles feed on store search. Give free reports to sellers in resale communities (seller groups on platforms like Vinted, Mercari, Carousell, or Xianyu), so the report carries the app name to the buyer. On TikTok, creator videos of "unboxing and checking if it's real" are a fit, since POIZON has shown this format can reach hundreds of thousands of views.

**When is the window:** The localized-title tactic is still cheap now. Legitly is already using it in verification, and the more apps adopt it, the less it's worth. The window for pure-AI verification has already closed, with most similar apps launched in the last 2026 years.

**What would prove this wrong:** If Realis's ratings start growing daily over the next month or two, or it breaks into the top 50 of Reference Top Grossing in a large market like the US, the UK, or Germany, then pure-AI verification plus localization can still grow in this crowded category, and the bar is lower than argued here. If the number of charting stores falls back into single digits, this wave was just an illusion built from a few subscriptions.

[iOS store page ↗](https://apps.apple.com/app/id6798683886)

**Research notes: competitor table, acquisition evidence, full research report**

Competitors

| Name | Where | Launched | Scale | How it differs from this one |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CheckCheck App | iOS | 2019-11 | Up to 7,253 ratings in a single store; 78 stores on category Top Grossing charts: #1 Panama, #4 Taiwan, #13 US (appstore library 11-06) | AI pre-screen + two human authenticators, about $6 per check, mature creator-promo-code playbook; Realis is a pure-AI subscription |
| LegitApp Authentication | iOS | 2020-10 | Claims 2.5M users; 361 Trustpilot reviews | Human + AI, $3–5 per check, tiered by speed |
| Legit Check: AI Scanner(Meltem Arslan) | iOS | 2025-06 | Charted in 64 stores' Top Grossing, Jordan #3, Vietnam #4; combined 367 rating | Also pure-AI subscription, launched a year earlier; covers 4× as many countries as Realis |
| Sneaker AI: Shoe Authenticator | iOS | 2024-07 | Charted in 39 stores' Top Grossing | Pure AI, shoes only |
| Legit Check: Real or Fake AI(Utku Gogen) | iOS | 2026-04 | 23 stores, Vietnam #8, Hong Kong #12 | Same category, also a Turkish developer |
| Legitly(OBZENA) | iOS | 2026-07 | 18 stores, Thailand #6, Lithuania #6 | Same category, also localizes titles by store |
| Verró: Tasche echt oder fake? | iOS | 2026-08-29 | 12 stores, Jordan #9 | Launched almost at the same time, bags only |
| Legit Check App By Ch | iOS | 2017-11 | Small | 100% human, from $9.99/check |
| Free verification on POIZON | Big-company features | 2020 | Big platform; TikTok creator promo videos at 3–600k views | Trading platform, free verification to drive trades |
| StockX / GOAT / eBay Authenticity Guarantee | Big-company features | — | Big platform | Platform verifies after receiving the item itself; third-party App reports don't count there |
| Entrupy | Other | 2017 | B2B, from $69/month | Physical scanning hardware for merchants |

Where users come from

- **Confirmed** **Store search + per-store localized titles (ASO)** : 30 languages; sv/mx/cl/pe title "Zapatillas Originales: Realis", it "Originale o Falso", nl "Echt of Nep", se "Äkta eller Falsk", kr "가품 정품", tw "驗鞋", us "Legit Check Shoes" (appstore library app_name)

- **Confirmed** **Hard paywall, weekly subscription** : weekly $7.99 / yearly $29.99; full checks and reports unlock only with a subscription (US store page)

- Inferred **Store "customers also bought" recommendations** : related recommendations on the Egypt store page are all shoe-verification Apps

- Inferred **Meta ads** : no match in the metaads library by App id, name, or atomik domain (limited library coverage)

- Inferred **TikTok / X / Reddit / media** : TikHub, x-radar, Jina, and Exa found no related content; the official site is only a placeholder page

## 驗鞋: why Legit Check (Realis) made it into recall

> Stores checked: all 115 stores in the appstore library (app_profile / app_day scanned across all stores), focusing on the 21 stores where it charts, the US, and the regional distribution of similar AI verification Apps. Data as of 2026-11-06.

### Bottom line

**It never really took off.** This is a subscription "AI shoe/luxury verification" App produced by a small Turkish studio (Atomik Teknoloji, 6 Apps all launched in 2026–7 October) pipeline. It made the Reference Top Grossing charts in 21 stores for two reasons: first, **each country's store title was rewritten in the local language as search terms** (Spanish "Zapatillas Originales", Italian "Originale o Falso", Dutch "Echt of Nep", Swedish "Äkta eller Falsk", Korean "가품 정품", Traditional Chinese "驗鞋"); second, **a hard weekly $7.99 paywall** . Reference Top Grossing thresholds in small countries are very low, so a handful of subscriptions is enough to chart. Globally it has only 2–3 ratings, 10 new in 0 days, and its rank curve has the shape of a single purchase: it jumps up, then drops every day. The category already has more than a dozen near-identical AI clones, and this one doesn't rank near the top.

### 1. Data: how big is it, really

| Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Launched | 2026-08-20; v1.1 released 2026-09-12 (full Traditional Chinese localization + rebuilt AI pipeline) | iTunes lookup, tw store |
| Global rating count | 2–3 (from 10-28 onward, 0 new per day) | appstore library app_day |
| Number of stores where it charts in Top Grossing | 10-28 has 11 stores → 11-04 has 17, 11-06 has 16 (another 2–6 stores on Top Free) | appstore library app_day |
| Best rank | Reference Top Grossing: Slovenia #8 (10-28), El Salvador #24 (10-28), Croatia #23 (10-31), Estonia #25 (11-03) | appstore library |
| Pricing | Free to download, weekly $7.99, yearly $29.99 | US store page (read via r.jina.ai) |
| US | Not on any chart (US title "Legit Check Shoes", 2 ratings) | appstore library / iTunes lookup us |

**A correction to the recall card** : the card says "Sweden 29", but it is actually `sv` = **El Salvador** (this store's title is the Spanish "Zapatillas Originales: Realis"); Sweden is `se`, where it only reached #199 on the Reference **Top Free** chart.

**The rank curve has the shape of a single purchase** : El Salvador 24→28→32→41→46→140→148→173→**25** →29; Egypt 88→97→…→174→**88** →109→121; Israel 48→74→107→64→…→191→**77** →109; Slovenia 8→12→21→32→39→46→107→…→134. In other words, one day a payment comes in, the rank jumps, then it falls every day with no sustained volume. Look at who sits in El Salvador's Reference Top Grossing #20–35: DeepL, several AI translators, a Bible App, "Insta followers". A handful of subscriptions is enough to chart on this chart (appstore library chart_rank 2026-11-06).

The description's claim of "30,000+ users" and the changelog's "thousands already check items before paying" don't match the global 2–3 ratings; treat them as marketing copy (unverified).

### 2. Competitors: who else does the same thing

This opportunity splits into two types: **human (plus AI pre-screening) per-check paid verification services that have been around a long time** , and **pure-AI subscription clones that appeared over the past 2025–2026 years** . Realis belongs to the latter.

| Product | Type | Launched | Scale (appstore library 2026-11-06) | How it differs from Realis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CheckCheck | iOS | 2019-11 | Highest single-store rating 7,253; 78 stores on the category Top Grossing chart, Panama #1, Taiwan #4, Mexico #5, US #13 | AI pre-screening + two human authenticators, ~$6 per check; brand and creator promo-code tactics are mature |
| LegitApp | iOS / web | 2020-10 | Claims 2.5M users, 361 Trustpilot reviews | Human + AI, $3–5 per check, tiered by speed |
| Legit Check App By Ch | iOS | 2017-11 | Small | 100% human, from $9.99/check |
| Legit Check: AI Scanner(Meltem Arslan) | iOS / Android | 2025-06 | Charted in 64 stores' Top Grossing: Jordan #3, Vietnam #4, Lithuania #5; combined 367 rating | Also pure-AI subscription, launched a year earlier; covers 4× as many countries as Realis |
| Sneaker AI: Shoe Authenticator | iOS | 2024-07 | Charted in 39 stores' Top Grossing | Pure AI, shoes only |
| Legit Check: Real or Fake AI(Utku Gogen) | iOS | 2026-04 | 23 stores, Vietnam #8, Hong Kong #12 | Same category, also a Turkish developer |
| Legitly(OBZENA) | iOS | 2026-07 | 18 stores, Thailand #6, Lithuania #6 | Same category, titles also localized by store (Portuguese "Autenticidade Original") |
| Verró: Tasche echt oder fake? | iOS | 2026-08-29 | 12 stores, Jordan #9 | Launched almost at the same time as Realis, bags only |
| LegitGrails / LegCheck / VeriBag / Legiteem8 etc. | iOS | 2022–2026 | 5–34 stores, rankings mostly at 40–150 | Same category, long tail |
| POIZON (international version of Dewu) free verification | iOS / Android | 2020 | Big player; TikTok creator videos at 3–600k views | Platform free verification, used to drive trades |
| StockX / GOAT / eBay Authenticity Guarantee | Big-company features | — | — | Trading platform receives and verifies the item itself; third-party reports don't count there |
| Entrupy | Other (hardware) | 2017 | B2B | Physical scanning device, from $69/month, for merchants |

Ranked by number of stores on Top Grossing, Realis (16 stores) sits around #6 among the pure-AI clones, ahead of it are AI Scanner (64), Sneaker AI (39), Legiteem8 (34), Real or Fake AI (23), Legitly (18). **It is not the leader, nor the first one.**

### 3. Growth tactics: where users come from

| Channel | Evidence | Confirmed? |
|---|---|---|
| Store search + localized titles per store (ASO) | 30 languages; localized titles written as the local search terms: sv/mx/cl/pe "Zapatillas Originales: Realis", it "Originale o Falso: Realis", nl "Echt of Nep: Realis", se "Äkta eller Falsk: Realis", kr "가품 정품", tw "驗鞋: Legit Check", us "Legit Check Shoes", all other stores "Legit Check App" (appstore library app_name) | Yes |
| Hard paywall + weekly subscription | Weekly $7.99 / yearly $29.99; the description states that only a subscription unlocks the full checks and reports | Yes |
| Store "You might also like" traffic | On the Egypt store page, the "Customers also bought" section is entirely similar authentication apps (TrueCheck, Handbag Authentication, Shoe Scanner) | Possibly, unverified |
| Meta ads | The metaads library returns nothing for the App id, the name, or the atomik domain | Nothing found (the library only tracks a set list of advertisers, so this doesn't mean they aren't advertising) |
| TikTok / X / Reddit / press | TikHub search for "realis legit check" returns no relevant videos; x-radar has no results for 30 days; Jina / Exa only surface the store pages and AppBrain listings; the developer site atomikteknoloji.com is a single line, "We things.", plus an email address | None |

### 4. Why it was surfaced (not why it charted)

1. **Small-country Reference Top Grossing charts have very low thresholds** : in storefronts like El Salvador, Estonia, Slovenia and Jordan, one or two $7.99 weekly subscriptions can put an app in the top 50, and the recall scoring treated "charted in 21 stores" as a signal.

2. **Localized titles capture search traffic in local languages** : local terms like "Echt of Nep" or "Originale o Falso" face far less competition than English "legit check", so a small volume of organic searches converts a few sales.

3. **Factory-style volume** : the same account shipped 6 apps between 2026 and October 7 (shoe verification, Magpie secondhand price estimates, berry food ingredient scanning, UK driving test routes, Swiss driving licence theory, Irish taxi exams). All share the pattern "narrow need + AI/question bank + subscription", and all have only occasional chart appearances (appstore library developer_id=6790185465). This is a "ship many, see which one takes off" approach; Realis performed best among them, but the scale is still very small.

### 5. Differentiation

The store copy highlights two selling points: **it says "cannot determine" and tells you which angle to re-shoot next** , and **it prompts you to photograph 8 angles, explains each judgment item, and produces a shareable report** . These target the pain point of pure AI verification that just guesses (a fashionaidaily 2026 review found that the same shoe got opposite verdicts across several apps, with rejection reasons reduced to a single word). But all of this is at the copy level; no reviews or third-party tests prove it delivers, and the copy for competitors (Legitly, AI Scanner) is much the same. **Differentiation is not why it charted** ; it charted on localized titles, the paywall, and low-threshold charts.

### 6. How visible it is

Few people know about it yet: no public revenue, and no media, X, Reddit or TikTok mention. But **the category itself is already crowded** : in the appstore library, AI verification apps with "legit check" or "real or fake" in their names number at least 15 since 2025-06, most launched in the past 2026 years, and many are from Turkish individual developers (Meltem Arslan, Utku Gogen, ENGIN KUTUK, MEHMET MOLLA, Eren Yalcın, kaan dinckal, and others).

### 7. What others can borrow

- **Using local-language search terms directly in each store's title** (rather than translating the English brand name) is the cheapest small-language ASO; combined with localization into 30 languages, it makes it easy to enter category charts in small markets.

- Top Grossing charts for Reference / Utilities in small countries have very low thresholds, so utility apps with a hard-paywall weekly subscription can easily "chart". **Discount this when reading recall signals** , and look at rating growth and rankings in the major markets instead.

### 8. Uncertain

- Actual downloads and subscriber counts (Apple doesn't disclose them; there are only 2–3 ratings, so the charting looks like a handful of sales).

- Whether it advertises on channels other than Apple Search Ads or Meta (our ad library doesn't cover it).

- The truth of the "30,000+ users" claim; the AI judgment accuracy has no external verification.

### Sources

- iTunes lookup: [itunes.apple.com/lookup?id=6798683886&country=tw](https://itunes.apple.com/lookup?id=6798683886&country=tw) / &country=us; all works by the developer, lookup id=6790185465

- US store page: [apps.apple.com/us/app/legit-check-shoes/id6798683886](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/legit-check-shoes/id6798683886) (in-app purchase prices)

- appstore library (agent-im server DuckDB): app_day, app_profile, app_name, chart_rank, 2026-10-28 to 11-06

- metaads library advertiser table (2026-11-06 query)

- TikHub TikTok search "legit check app", "realis legit check"; x-radar search "legit check app", "Realis"

- [atomikteknoloji.com/](https://atomikteknoloji.com/) (placeholder page)

- [fashionaidaily.com/blog/best-ai-sneaker-authentication-apps-…](https://fashionaidaily.com/blog/best-ai-sneaker-authentication-apps-2026/) (similar reviews and pricing)

- [www.trustpilot.com/review/legitapp.com](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/legitapp.com);[legitapp.com/](https://legitapp.com/)

- [www.appbrain.com/appstore/legit-check-shoes-realis/ios-67986…](https://www.appbrain.com/appstore/legit-check-shoes-realis/ios-6798683886)

This article was written by AI from public data and the data we collect daily. Numbers are sourced, and inferences are labeled.